<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NASDAQ Stocks show Moving Average Divergence</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisperruna.com/2007/07/02/nasdaq-stocks-show-moving-average-divergence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisperruna.com/2007/07/02/nasdaq-stocks-show-moving-average-divergence/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 03:09:49 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: chrisperruna.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Two Months of Warnings</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisperruna.com/2007/07/02/nasdaq-stocks-show-moving-average-divergence/comment-page-1/#comment-13459</link>
		<dc:creator>chrisperruna.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Two Months of Warnings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 16:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisperruna.com/2007/07/02/nasdaq-stocks-show-moving-average-divergence/#comment-13459</guid>
		<description>[...] NASDAQ Stocks show Moving Average Divergence July 2, 2007 &#8220;Another secondary indicator is pointing to an exhausted market that is due for a correction or pullback but please understand that this is only a secondary indicator.&#8221; &#8220;It tells me that the weaker stocks are starting to drop below their 50-day moving average support level which indicates that the market leaders and general market may soon follow.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] NASDAQ Stocks show Moving Average Divergence July 2, 2007 &#8220;Another secondary indicator is pointing to an exhausted market that is due for a correction or pullback but please understand that this is only a secondary indicator.&#8221; &#8220;It tells me that the weaker stocks are starting to drop below their 50-day moving average support level which indicates that the market leaders and general market may soon follow.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisperruna.com/2007/07/02/nasdaq-stocks-show-moving-average-divergence/comment-page-1/#comment-11690</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 12:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisperruna.com/2007/07/02/nasdaq-stocks-show-moving-average-divergence/#comment-11690</guid>
		<description>DrFox,
The Portuguese is coming along slowly although I can understand a lot more than I can speak.  

The word divergence in these charts represents the opposite direction that the NASDAQ is moving (gray shaded area) and the red/black line representing the individual stocks.  The two have moved in harmony over the past several years but have recently moved in opposite directions over the past couple of months.  This doesn’t tell us anything other than send up a red flag warning to keep a closer eye on your holdings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DrFox,<br />
The Portuguese is coming along slowly although I can understand a lot more than I can speak.  </p>
<p>The word divergence in these charts represents the opposite direction that the NASDAQ is moving (gray shaded area) and the red/black line representing the individual stocks.  The two have moved in harmony over the past several years but have recently moved in opposite directions over the past couple of months.  This doesn’t tell us anything other than send up a red flag warning to keep a closer eye on your holdings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DrFox</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisperruna.com/2007/07/02/nasdaq-stocks-show-moving-average-divergence/comment-page-1/#comment-11522</link>
		<dc:creator>DrFox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 10:18:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisperruna.com/2007/07/02/nasdaq-stocks-show-moving-average-divergence/#comment-11522</guid>
		<description>Dear Cris,

How is your portuguese learning curve doing?  :)

I like the post and also are in &quot;watching&quot; status for my portfolio here in Brazil.

But looking at the graphics and to the five previous corrections, it seen there is a direct positive and strong correlation (close to 1) between the nasd and the percitile curves.

So by looking into this, I do not understand what that divergence realy means. Is is acting contrarian to previous falls.

Does the price action follow the percentile action or is it a reflex from the first?

I think that if we could somehow normalize booth graphics, we might be in a better position to compare.

I don&#039;t know. I am just trowing out my toughts.

[]&#039;s

DrFox</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Cris,</p>
<p>How is your portuguese learning curve doing?  <img src='http://www.chrisperruna.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I like the post and also are in &#8220;watching&#8221; status for my portfolio here in Brazil.</p>
<p>But looking at the graphics and to the five previous corrections, it seen there is a direct positive and strong correlation (close to 1) between the nasd and the percitile curves.</p>
<p>So by looking into this, I do not understand what that divergence realy means. Is is acting contrarian to previous falls.</p>
<p>Does the price action follow the percentile action or is it a reflex from the first?</p>
<p>I think that if we could somehow normalize booth graphics, we might be in a better position to compare.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know. I am just trowing out my toughts.</p>
<p>[]&#8217;s</p>
<p>DrFox</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill aka NO DooDahs</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisperruna.com/2007/07/02/nasdaq-stocks-show-moving-average-divergence/comment-page-1/#comment-11426</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill aka NO DooDahs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 13:39:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisperruna.com/2007/07/02/nasdaq-stocks-show-moving-average-divergence/#comment-11426</guid>
		<description>It seems to me, from looking at the 200dma chart, that a very high amount of participation precedes a correction, indicating that people are getting long trash, and the bull is long in the tooth.  Therefore, the smaller participation is probably bullish, and not bearish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me, from looking at the 200dma chart, that a very high amount of participation precedes a correction, indicating that people are getting long trash, and the bull is long in the tooth.  Therefore, the smaller participation is probably bullish, and not bearish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Say Hello to July 2 &#171; Trading for the Masses</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisperruna.com/2007/07/02/nasdaq-stocks-show-moving-average-divergence/comment-page-1/#comment-11322</link>
		<dc:creator>Say Hello to July 2 &#171; Trading for the Masses</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 19:45:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisperruna.com/2007/07/02/nasdaq-stocks-show-moving-average-divergence/#comment-11322</guid>
		<description>[...] Nasdaq, moving averages showing divergences [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Nasdaq, moving averages showing divergences [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
