<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NH NL picks Market Tops and Bottoms</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisperruna.com/2009/05/11/nh-nl-picks-market-tops-and-bottoms/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisperruna.com/2009/05/11/nh-nl-picks-market-tops-and-bottoms/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 03:09:49 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Raj Chadha</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisperruna.com/2009/05/11/nh-nl-picks-market-tops-and-bottoms/comment-page-1/#comment-21489</link>
		<dc:creator>Raj Chadha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 15:31:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisperruna.com/?p=1872#comment-21489</guid>
		<description>The easiest way to calculate and use the cumulative NH-NL index is to subscribe to TC2000-MutualFund
service. They have named it as indicator T2123. I plot 13Week exponential moving average on weekly chart. Whenever indicator is above the moving average, I stay invested completely, and whenever below, I stay out. It has worked miracles for me. The cost of service about $140 a year. Good luck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The easiest way to calculate and use the cumulative NH-NL index is to subscribe to TC2000-MutualFund<br />
service. They have named it as indicator T2123. I plot 13Week exponential moving average on weekly chart. Whenever indicator is above the moving average, I stay invested completely, and whenever below, I stay out. It has worked miracles for me. The cost of service about $140 a year. Good luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chrisperruna.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; New High New Low Data</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisperruna.com/2009/05/11/nh-nl-picks-market-tops-and-bottoms/comment-page-1/#comment-21171</link>
		<dc:creator>chrisperruna.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; New High New Low Data</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 01:55:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisperruna.com/?p=1872#comment-21171</guid>
		<description>[...] I said in the post NH NL Picks Market Tops and Bottoms: Consistent Nasdaq readings above 100-200+ will be the official confirmation to grab and add shares [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I said in the post NH NL Picks Market Tops and Bottoms: Consistent Nasdaq readings above 100-200+ will be the official confirmation to grab and add shares [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chrisperruna.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Cumulative Advance Decline Line</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisperruna.com/2009/05/11/nh-nl-picks-market-tops-and-bottoms/comment-page-1/#comment-21092</link>
		<dc:creator>chrisperruna.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Cumulative Advance Decline Line</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 16:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisperruna.com/?p=1872#comment-21092</guid>
		<description>[...] has not screamed buy but it is still etching higher, ever so slowly. The charts in the post titled NH-NL Picks Market Tops and Bottoms show clearly how weak the differential has been since [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has not screamed buy but it is still etching higher, ever so slowly. The charts in the post titled NH-NL Picks Market Tops and Bottoms show clearly how weak the differential has been since [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cédric</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisperruna.com/2009/05/11/nh-nl-picks-market-tops-and-bottoms/comment-page-1/#comment-21081</link>
		<dc:creator>Cédric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 14:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisperruna.com/?p=1872#comment-21081</guid>
		<description>1st October will be the official start of &quot;bull&quot; presidential market cycle</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1st October will be the official start of &#8220;bull&#8221; presidential market cycle</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cédric</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisperruna.com/2009/05/11/nh-nl-picks-market-tops-and-bottoms/comment-page-1/#comment-21079</link>
		<dc:creator>Cédric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 12:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisperruna.com/?p=1872#comment-21079</guid>
		<description>I hope so... but the real game is to wait for the first signal of this potential cycle of accumulation in order to be full invested in leaders... Am I wrong Eric W ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope so&#8230; but the real game is to wait for the first signal of this potential cycle of accumulation in order to be full invested in leaders&#8230; Am I wrong Eric W ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric W</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisperruna.com/2009/05/11/nh-nl-picks-market-tops-and-bottoms/comment-page-1/#comment-21077</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 03:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisperruna.com/?p=1872#comment-21077</guid>
		<description>Expanding on my previous post, let me predict with 90% probability that we will start seeing enormous upticks in October and November of this year. Will that be meaningful?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Expanding on my previous post, let me predict with 90% probability that we will start seeing enormous upticks in October and November of this year. Will that be meaningful?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NewsFlashr Editor Picks for May 23 2009 &#124; Penny Stock Trading System Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisperruna.com/2009/05/11/nh-nl-picks-market-tops-and-bottoms/comment-page-1/#comment-21065</link>
		<dc:creator>NewsFlashr Editor Picks for May 23 2009 &#124; Penny Stock Trading System Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 11:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisperruna.com/?p=1872#comment-21065</guid>
		<description>[...] Chris Perruna shows various graphs and demonstrates how the New Highs and New Low Index can &#8220;Pick&#8221; Market Tops and Bottoms.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Chris Perruna shows various graphs and demonstrates how the New Highs and New Low Index can &#8220;Pick&#8221; Market Tops and Bottoms.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VA Voter</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisperruna.com/2009/05/11/nh-nl-picks-market-tops-and-bottoms/comment-page-1/#comment-21062</link>
		<dc:creator>VA Voter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 02:06:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisperruna.com/?p=1872#comment-21062</guid>
		<description>I misspoke in prior comment.  I meant to refer to the $NAHL only.  StockCharts.com shows a high of about 28 for the week for $NAHL and a high of about 6 for $NTHL.

As I interprete either of the charts there is no apparent upside strenght.  

Link:  http://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=$NAHL&amp;p=D&amp;en=&amp;id=p11140236603</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I misspoke in prior comment.  I meant to refer to the $NAHL only.  StockCharts.com shows a high of about 28 for the week for $NAHL and a high of about 6 for $NTHL.</p>
<p>As I interprete either of the charts there is no apparent upside strenght.  </p>
<p>Link:  <a href="http://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=$NAHL&amp;p=D&amp;en=&amp;id=p11140236603" rel="nofollow">http://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=$NAHL&amp;p=D&amp;en=&amp;id=p11140236603</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VA Voter</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisperruna.com/2009/05/11/nh-nl-picks-market-tops-and-bottoms/comment-page-1/#comment-21061</link>
		<dc:creator>VA Voter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 01:53:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisperruna.com/?p=1872#comment-21061</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m confused.  

Using StockCharts.com I tracked both $NAHL and $NYHL with highs for weekending 5/22 and see vastly different(lower) highs than your 5/20 Tweet showing  69 and  5 respectfully.

Is there a history of data errors from StockChart.com or Pinnacle?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m confused.  </p>
<p>Using StockCharts.com I tracked both $NAHL and $NYHL with highs for weekending 5/22 and see vastly different(lower) highs than your 5/20 Tweet showing  69 and  5 respectfully.</p>
<p>Is there a history of data errors from StockChart.com or Pinnacle?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric W</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisperruna.com/2009/05/11/nh-nl-picks-market-tops-and-bottoms/comment-page-1/#comment-21054</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 02:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisperruna.com/?p=1872#comment-21054</guid>
		<description>I think these are great charts, but... I think it is worth considering the magnitude of the drop in October of 2008 when correlation for just about everything was 1. That pretty much guarantees that you won&#039;t start seeing significant upticks in the chart until October of 2009, maybe. So in this particular time period, I don&#039;t think you should interpret the lack of substantial upticks as meaningful. The downticks should continue to be meaningful and useful. 

That&#039;s not to say that I think we&#039;re in a new long-term Bull Market or anything, just that in any more normal circumstances there would have been some nice upticks due to the strength, magnitude, and breadth of the recent rally.

I think enough of this that I have incorporated the charting into my spreadsheet, using a line instead of bars, with an overlay of the NYSE composite. I knew that data I&#039;ve been accumulating would be useful!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think these are great charts, but&#8230; I think it is worth considering the magnitude of the drop in October of 2008 when correlation for just about everything was 1. That pretty much guarantees that you won&#8217;t start seeing significant upticks in the chart until October of 2009, maybe. So in this particular time period, I don&#8217;t think you should interpret the lack of substantial upticks as meaningful. The downticks should continue to be meaningful and useful. </p>
<p>That&#8217;s not to say that I think we&#8217;re in a new long-term Bull Market or anything, just that in any more normal circumstances there would have been some nice upticks due to the strength, magnitude, and breadth of the recent rally.</p>
<p>I think enough of this that I have incorporated the charting into my spreadsheet, using a line instead of bars, with an overlay of the NYSE composite. I knew that data I&#8217;ve been accumulating would be useful!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
