You are here: Home / 2005 / Archives for January 2005

Archives for January 2005

How do you handle a Stop Loss?

January 28, 2005 by 1 Comment

…I strongly agree with the philosophy of cutting losses quickly as suggested by many great traders, more specifically: Jesse Livermore, William O’Neil and Nicholas Darvas. Over the past several years, I would implement a trailing stop by manually moving the stop myself as the stock was rising. More recently, I started to use the jazzy tools or new technology that my online firm offered (the system moves the stop for the trader at a pre-determined percentage as the stock rises, say 10% from the price).

Over the past 18 months, I have noticed that several stocks (more so than ever in my portfolio and research) will implode intraday and then rebound in the final hour of trading. This has always been the case since I started investing but has become more apparent in the past year or two (at least to me). It seems that “program trading” is really taking over the individual investor and took advantage of the “little guy or gal” in the latest bull market by shaking out weak investors every chance they get.

I had always cut a loss with my stop already placed at 7-10% below my purchase price, depending on market conditions and individual stock conditions. Several times in late 2002 and 2003, I was stopped out intraday, only to see the stock bounce back by the end of the day. I was becoming angry as my trades were placed correctly but I sold out intraday, only to see the stock end above my original sell stop position.

As the year progressed, I decided to remove my automatic stop loss and determine if I should sell based on the full day’s action. My results improved slightly. Stocks that are worthy of keeping are now held until the final trading hour so I can review the entire day’s action without the noise from day traders and program trading. I don’t need to buy back my stocks at the end of the day, the next morning or next several days because program traders triggered my sell stop. On very volatile stocks, such as TZOO, I still place a manual sell stop to protect my downside but I leave room outside of the traditional 7-10%. If I have some profits, I will set the stop at 15% to allow movement during the day.

I must ask:

Does anyone else see similar situations?

I am curious to know if any of you have bought a stock and was forced to sell via a sell stop, only to watch the stock rebound later in the day or the near future. Respond to the blog so we can interact. Don’t be shy.

I went back to read Jesse Livermore and realized that he did suggest to ignore all intraday activity. This advice was given in 1923, so the game has always been the same, as I have been taught, but I have noticed an increase in the program trading over the past 18 months.

NOTE: I am not only speaking of stocks breaking out, I am mostly talking about stocks that have made considerable advances and then correct (healthy corrections on solid stocks). With a stop loss in place, you may get shaken out. I now make all decisions after the market closes. This allows me to view multiple charts and gives me the choice to make an evaluation without intraday emotions fueling my thoughts or persuading that final decision.

Enjoy the Weekend,

Piranha

Filed Under: Selling

DISCLAIMER

January 27, 2005 by 2 Comments

chrisperruna.com Disclaimer
This website is aimed to educate, research and demonstrate successful methods of investing to all investors. chrisperruna.com will not be held responsible for the actions taken by individuals, members, non-members, parties or corporations based on ideas, thoughts, concepts or information posted on this website. chrisperruna.com shall not be liable to you or to anyone else for any loss or injury caused in whole or in part by its negligence, omission in procuring, compiling, interpreting, editing, writing, reporting, transmitting or delivering any opinions, information, consulting, or data through this site.

chrisperruna.com is not a licensed stockbroker or investment advisor. Nothing contained herein should be construed as a recommendation to buy, hold or sell any securities. We are not affiliated with any brokerage firms, companies, publications or any other financial or investing institutions. Always seek the advice of a financial advisor and do your own independent research prior to making any trade or investment decisions.

The information, data, research, charts and opinions through this website are based on interpretation of available market and stock data. We cannot guarantee the accuracy of the sources and interpretation may be subjective. In no event will we be liable to you or anyone else for any decision made or action taken by you in reliance upon such information, opinions, or data or for any consequential, special or similar damages, including but not limited to lost profits, trading losses or damages resulting from inconvenience, even if advised of the possibility of such damages. At no time does chrisperruna.com endorse or is affiliated with any stock and/or company mentioned through the pages of this website.

All content within the chrisperruna.com web site is property of chrisperruna.com and may not be reproduced or duplicated for any reason without the permission of chrisperruna.com and/or without proper credit to original author. The information presented here may not under any circumstances be resold or redistributed for compensation of any kind without prior written permission.

chrisperruna.com does not warrant the accuracy, completeness, quality, adequacy or content of any information on our web site. Such information is provided “as is” without warranty or condition of any kind, either express or implied. The chrisperruna.com web site could include inaccuracies or typographical errors.

Investing in the stock market is high risk. chrisperruna.com assumes no responsibilities for your trading and investment results. Your use of chrisperruna.com and the information contained herein is solely for educational and analytical (research) purposes.

Filed Under: Misc.

Syneron Medical Ltd (ELOS)

January 19, 2005 by Leave a Comment

…It closed today at $29.77, down $1.05 on volume lower than the 50-day average. This would be considered a positive pullback on low volume.

ELOS was a strong stock for MSW in 2004:

139% Gain

Posted 9/22/2004 @ 15.85

Peaked 11/26/2004 @ 37.84

In two months the stock more than doubled as we listed it over 10 times on daily and weekly screens. I did several write ups on this very blog back in November on ELOS as it started to break down and fall into its current base pattern.

ELOS was listed on the daily screen last night but was not near a new 52-week high? I received some questions as to why ELOS made the screen if it wasn’t a buy. On the daily screens, I try to display stocks that can become a buy in the coming days and weeks, I include stocks that may are current buys and stocks that are already trending up. It is up to you, the individual investor to decide what stocks to buy. I can only take you so far before you take the final action.

ELOS is currently building a cup shaped base, the first base since it opened as an IPO in 2004. The fundamentals are excellent with 3-year earnings of 449% and 3-year sales of 302%. The ROE is slightly below par but still good. The PEG ratio sits at 1.17 which is slightly higher than the key 1.0 mark.

This stock would not become a buy until the right side of the base is finished and a downward sloping handle forms on lower volume. I will keep you posted if this stock correctly finished its base. Do not buy prematurely as the majority of stocks that don’t finish their base will continue to fall. A case study will be posted if a handle starts to form and this will be posted BEFORE the possible breakout.

Consider this an ongoing real-time case study.

Piranha

Filed Under: Stocks

Green “APPLE”s

January 13, 2005 by 1 Comment

…I love my laptop, a Dell to be specific. I bring this machine everywhere I go and my life depends on it. Whenever I have a problem, I call up technical support and they answerer or fix my problem as quick as possible. I love the product and I love the company but I do not love the stock.

Never love a stock, we have taught you to control emotions!

I never learned to use a MAC so I never had any experience with Apple (good or bad). Recently, my wife and I purchased an iPod and have been downloading songs from iTunes. Excellent products! I love these products and have since seen Apple show up on my screens over the past few months. Should I love the stock? NO. Never love a stock!

Apple (AAPL) first showed up on my weekly screens on 10/24/04 at $47.41. Since this time, Apple has made the daily and weekly screens numerous times. I didn’t post Apple because of news; I posted the stock based on technical and fundamental information. The charts said that AAPL showed the potential to move higher based on the trend.

10/25/04 – 10/29/04: $52.40

11/22/04 – 11/26/04: $64.55

11/29/04 – 12/03/04: $62.68

12/06/04 – 12/10/04: $65.15

01/03/05 – 01/07/05: $69.25

The most recent daily post was on 01/05/05 at $64.50.

Apple has an intraday high of $74.72 and opened for a gap-up at $73.87, giving us a total gain to date of 57%. Not bad for 10 weeks of work, especially in this muddy market environment. I do have to say that AAPL closed near the intraday low – a negative sign.

The lesson of this blog is to pay attention to the charts, not the news. The charts showed us a buy 10 week ago and confirmed this buy several times since late October. Many people went out and bought Apple today based on the great news from yesterday (Apple shattered estimates). I am not saying that AAPL can’t go higher but I know from experience that it may be too late to join the party when the news hits the street and everybody knows, even the “dumb money”. If I was smart money (an institutional investor), I would be selling into strength today. If I was really smart money, I would have most likely sold over the past week or so, based on the general market trend.

Piranha

Filed Under: Stocks

Is NGPS a Short Candidate?

January 8, 2005 by Leave a Comment

…I was asked if NGPS had become short sale because it had reached overbought levels in the past month. As we can all see, NGPS was down 36.49% on the largest weekly volume of all time. This does not mean we sell our shares and immediately short the stock. Why?

A stock, in my view, is never a short sell until is below the 50-day moving average (at least) and even more so when it drops below the 200-day moving average. The first break below the 50-day is still not the ideal time to short a stock. The stock must try to break back above this line and fail one or two times. At this point, based on charts, an ideal short position can be opened.

I will look in my files for a short sell chart that I have used in the past. I will also look for a current short sell chart pattern in today’s market. I will post a case study this weekend highlighting the characteristics of a prime short candidate.

As for NGPS, it’s still above the 50 and 200 day moving averages. A stock does not automatically become a short sell because it becomes overbought. This is a very common misconception to most investors.

I don’t recommend shorting stocks until you have mastered years of making profits buying and selling regular positions. It’s hard enough to do just that consistently.

Piranha

Filed Under: Shorting
Next Page »