You are here: Home / 2005 / Archives for December 2005

Archives for December 2005

Buy High and Sell Higher

December 29, 2005 by Leave a Comment

…Many of Wall Street’s well known guru’s tell prospective investors to buy low and sell high but is this really a solid strategy. I don’t think so especially when buying low usually means bottom fishing or looking for badly beaten down stocks that are no where near new high territory. When I started investing, I didn’t like the concept of buying stocks as they move into new 52-week high ground but I have come to realize that this may be the best strategy on the street. I first read about this type of strategy from Jesse Livermore, then William O’Neil, then Bernard Baruch and finally Gerald Loeb. My entire philosophy has been developed around this idea of buying high and selling higher and my results speak for themselves. I don’t have to prove anything; the numbers do it for me.

Without getting into a lengthy discussion on the topic, I will highlight a present day example that I posted last night on GMXR on the daily screen:

12/28/05 Daily Screen Excerpt:
“Many of you may remember that we first started to screen GMXR on 6/28/05 at $14.58 (daily screens only). We then added the stock to the weekly screens and the MSW Index on 9/27/05 at 24.00 (64% higher than our debut coverage). Today the stock gained another 6.13% on volume 188% larger than the 50-d m.a. GMXR has been on a tear and I have started to give the signal to lock in partial gains or at least protect your gains from a quick pullback. I want you all to understand the lesson of buying stocks that are making new highs. Time and time again I explain that stocks making new highs typically continue to make new highs. If anyone was scared to buy into GMXR at our $24 pivot point after the $10 run-up from $14, you have missed the additional 72% gain. This is what I wrote about GMXR on the 9/27/05 weekly screen:

“I see a breakout area near $23 to $24.” This week the stock hit $24.00 intraday but closed off of that price and stayed in the currently forming flat base. The official buy point is now a move above $24 on above average volume”

The stock (GMXR) closed at $41.35 today (12/28/05), exactly three months later. The gain from our first daily screen on June 28, 2005 is an impressive 184%. The stock has made a total of 17 weekly screens (including several weeks on the watch list) in 2005.”

Now you can see that a strong stock (a market leader) making new highs can go on to make additional highs but most novice investors would not buy at $24 after looking at the chart and seeing a 700% increase in the previous two years to $24. GMXR ran up from $2.50 to $24 in eighteen months and has since moved above $40 in the past three months. What looks high to one investor may still be low to another. GMXR wasn’t extended when we established the $24 pivot point so this helped us make a sound decision after the gains of the previous year. GMXR is now up over 1,500% in the past few years but I am extremely happy with my 72% gain locked-in (a gain that has happened in a few short months).

I can write forever about stocks that I buy at new 52-week highs and then sell much higher at a later date. It happens every year but most individual investors continue to bottom feed and buy beaten down stocks that aren’t going anywhere fast. Too often investors average down and continue to throw good money after bad instead of throwing good money after good. They get scared that stocks making new 52-week highs will start to reverse and crash the minute they enter. If you employ sell rules, you can protect yourself from this scenario (because it does happen from time to time). Not every stock you buy will continue to move higher.
Piranha

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Real Trading and Emotions

December 28, 2005 by Leave a Comment

…I received an e-mail from an aspiring investor in the market and was very pleased to see the progress of this young student. He stated several experiences he has had with the market but then went on to tell me that they were all through a virtual account. While his experiences are great, I had to stop him short when he compared them to my own real life experiences when I lost a great deal of my money during the early stages of the bust in 2000. I know he may have become emotional when the virtual account lost money but this pales in comparison when you or I lose real money in the real market. Below is what I wrote back to this student of the market:

It is great to see you learning how to cope with the market and your emotions but I must let you know that paper trading and real trading are two different universes. Losing on paper is nothing like the real thing and your decisions on paper will never resemble what you actually do in real life with real money. I am not trying to discourage you but it is not the same, no matter what anyone says. Try it and you will know exactly what I mean.

Another comment: I would suggest that you paper trade a realistic amount instead of $100,000 because that doesn’t seem like the amount you would start with in real life. If you are only going to start with $5,000 or $10,000, only paper trade with that amount so you can get a more realistic feel for what you can accomplish. Make your virtual trading as close to the real thing as possible. Buying $50,000 in calls doesn’t seem realistic at all (you would never do that at this point in time in real life, if ever).

One last thing: even if you only have $2,000 or less, trade it for real. Get your feet wet and see what happens. Don’t try to make money, try to develop a real life system. Make mistakes and learn to control emotions because it will only make you stronger later in life when you do trade larger sums of money. I am not sure how old you are but starting with any real amount of money is better than fake money in my opinion. Some will argue that virtual trading is very helpful and I agree on a limited basis but nothing will ever teach you what you need to know except the real thing.

Keep reading and keep learning and good luck.
Piranha

Filed Under: Psychology

January Effect “2006”

December 27, 2005 by Leave a Comment

…I wrote an article about the so-called “January effect” last December right here on this blog. Many publications and stock market “gurus” will be talking about the January effect and how you may profit from the cyclical trends that supposedly exist. Portions of this entry will reiterate what I said last year but it is important to restate what I believe may help you ignore these talking heads.

Here at MSW, we follow rules and we try to eliminate emotion or at least keep it a bare minimum which allows us to invest intelligently. Without our philosophy, we would be aimlessly throwing money in all directions, hoping and praying for profits. We would most likely listen to hot stock tips and jump on the bandwagon of every new trading system or theory that came across our desks and computer screens.

The rumblings about the “January Effect” are starting to appear in stock market newsletters, brokerage house e-zines and the mainstream market media. I cringe every time I hear some talking head try to convince investors to buy beaten down shares in companies that will bounce in the first several weeks of the year. I see too many people jump at the opportunity to change their investing beliefs because some analyst on the other end of computer wrote an article claiming to make you lots of money in the first several weeks of the year.

Now, looking back at the MSW screens from late December and January, we did find several small cap stocks (below $10) that did make some big moves but they were still part of my system. I didn’t jump ship in search for a bounce back stock. These stocks included:

SPTN: first covered on 12/31/04 at $6.64 (made a total of 16 weekly screens with the last screen in July 16, 2005). Peak screen on 7/9/05 at $15.04, 127% gain

CULS: first covered on 1/9/05 at $7.69 (made a total of 9 weekly screens with the last screen on 4/16/05). Peak screen on 4/9/05 at 11.53, 50% gain

FORD: first covered on 1/23/05 at $6.38 (made a total of 32 weekly screens with the last screen on 11/19/05). Peak screen on 8/6/05 at 26.80, 320% gain – Top gaining MSW Stock in 2005!

Be strong and ignore the noise coming from every direction. Instead of looking into their theoretical bounces that may or may not occur, take the time to review last year’s trades and document the good and bad aspects of your portfolio. Look for your best trades and understand why you made money. Study your poor trades and understand where you made the mistakes. Correct those mistakes in the coming year.

Be honest with yourself and flag the areas of your trading system that need the most work and continue to polish your strengths. Don’t abandon what is working because a “talking head” on television tells you his system works in only 15 minutes per day, two days per week. In recent months, we have talked more about options and the leverage they provide and I know some of you have made decent profits in 2005 due to call contracts. Don’t get over excited and think you will be a multi-millionaire by the end of 2006 because you have invented the latest “fool-proof” options strategy. Work the system step by step and document what works and what doesn’t wok. Don’t bite on the “get rich quick” options programs that play across your television at 3am on weeknights.

Stick to one system that works and try to consolidate the strongest features of that system to your advantage and ignore the hundreds of other systems and indicators that can be found on every investing web site on the net.

We focus on price and volume here at MSW, which is all you need to become a successful trader. Establish strong or accelerating fundamentals and then confirm a quality trend on the charts and you will reap returns better than 99% of the general population.

Stay focused in the New Year, start fresh and think positive! Instead of reading 100 books this year on 80 different trading systems, reread a few essential books that focus on one system that best suits your style of investing. Good luck in 2006!

-Piranha

Filed Under: General Market

Why do Stocks Split?

December 21, 2005 by Leave a Comment

Today’s topic covers stock splits: What are they and why are they done.

E-mail Question from Member:
Chris –
Here’s the question: I’m curious to know why some companies chose to split their stock (like HANS), while other companies chose to allow their stock to run (like GOOG). Is there any rhyme or reason as to why some managers chose to split and others don’t?

My Answer:
I will start by giving a brief definition of a stock split for those of you that are unfamiliar with the term. Every company that trades stock publicly has a set number of shares that are outstanding. A stock split is a decision by the company’s board of directors to increase the number of shares that are outstanding by issuing more shares to current shareholders. I will use Hansen Natural (HANS) as a recent example of a stock that split in 2005 while on our screens. I originally started coverage on the stock near $66 in May 2005 before a 2-for-1 stock split that took place in August of 2005. If you were to look at a current chart for HANS, the price in May 2005 would show you a number in the $30 range (half of the original price) due to the split. When a split takes place (in this example), every shareholder with one stock is given an additional share. So, Hansen Natural had approximately 11 million shares outstanding before the split and it now has 22 million shares outstanding after its 2-for-1 split. If you owned 100 shares near $90 when it split, your account would be adjusted to 200 shares near $45.

As investopedia.com states: One share represents the value of the company’s underlying assets plus its growth potential divided by the number of outstanding shares. After a stock split, the only value that changes is the denominator in the equation. After a split, the stock price will be reduced since the number of shares that are outstanding is increased. In the example of a 2-for-1 split, the share price will be halved.

So why does a company want to split its stock?

Most individuals and small investors believe that a stock is more affordable at a lower price and they will only buy if the stock seems reasonable. Currently, Google is trading above $400 per share; so many investors will not buy this stock because they believe it is too expensive. In all actuality, 100 shares at $400 are the same as 400 shares at $100. Buying Hansen at $100 per share in August was actually cheaper than buying it now at $83 because the $83 is actually worth $166 before the split. Another reason for a split is a clue to the market that the growth in the company is expected to last (this is an assumption that the company’s directors make when asking for the split). When the board decides that a stock should be split, they send a voting ballot to every shareholder to make the final decision. I have voted in these ballots and ironically, the first stock I ever bought in my life split 2-for-1 (I thought I was important because I had a say in the stock).

Some stocks have split two or three times in one year (especially if you go back to the heart of the 1999 bull run) and some stocks don’t like to split such as NVR (a home building stock), Google and the most famous: Berkshire Hathaway, owned by the second richest man in the world (Warren Buffett). The current price for BRK-A is $88,600 with a 52-week range of $78,800 – $92,000. To buy 1 share on the open market today would cost you $88,600.

So, a stock split is used primarily by companies that have seen their share prices increase substantially. A stock split increases the number of outstanding shares and therefore decreases the price per share. This helps makes the shares more affordable to small investors and provides an indicator of the health of the company.
Piranha

Filed Under: Education

All Good Stocks Come to an End

December 16, 2005 by Leave a Comment

…Last night, I officially removed Urban Outfitters (URBN) from the MSW Index and the weekly screens for the first time since January 9, 2004. Yes, just short of two years on this website (we only started to publish our screens on MSW in 2004). I was screening URBN on Richdad.com and Investors.com throughout 2004 before I had my own established community on the web. My screens can be found under the username “piranha526” on both forums.

Over the past few weeks, I have started to get the feeling that URBN was losing strength and was starting to turn. I can’t say that I knew it would slice through the 200-d moving average (a support line it has not sliced for two plus years) but I did see that is was starting to change the way it was trading. This past Saturday (12/10/05), I said this on the MSW Index:

“this stock may be seeing its last days on the MSW Index ($30.28)”

Well, several days later, it was removed at $26.51, still representing a very respectable 164% gain since it was first covered. On Saturday, the stock was still holding a 200%+ gain on MSW from early 2004 and reached a peak gain of 236% when the latest 52-week high was set at $33.77 a few weeks back.

I stuck with the stock in September and October when it challenged the 200-d m.a. but it never sliced the line the way it has this week. The violation of the long term support on above average volume was an instant sell signal with no questions asked. When something as uncharacteristic as this happens in a stock that has been trading above the moving average, you sell and you sell quickly to lock in all profits if you have not done so already. This action tells us plain and clear that the situation has changed and the stock is ready to move in another direction. There is a chance that it can come back but don’t sit and wait to see if it will. Get out, get your profits and wait and move on to another opportunity.

This was what I wrote last night on the daily screen:

URBN – 26.51, last Saturday, I said this: “this stock may be seeing its last days on the MSW Index ($30.28)” and today, this was confirmed. This is the first break below the 200-d m.a. in this type of fashion in years. Sell and lock in profits! Urban is the second stock this week to be removed from the MSW Index.

I will be preparing a case study on URBN, guiding you through all of our analysis over the past two years. The stock made several dozen weekly screens since 2004 (possibly 100+ daily screens) and gave members multiple opportunities to produce profits in this stock. The recent drop may be foreshadowing to a weak holiday retail season. I don’t know if this is why but come back and see what the news is all about in a month or so. The technicals always give you the story before it breaks! The key is to act now and find out later! Watch your other retail positions very closely.
Piranha

Filed Under: Stocks
Next Page »