Thursday’s move was powerful and it was powerful on several levels. I say this because the new highs list on the daily screen is the strongest I have seen since the end of March. The MSW Index stocks were simply amazing and have a 5% gain for the week (a total of 14 stocks – 8 of them are up more than 6% with two in double digits). Several stocks we have been following together over the past several weeks broke out or moved to new highs, many on above average volume – a sure sign of accumulation. The Fed raised the rate by 25 basis points to 5.25%, the 17th in the past two years but also gave investors an idea that they may slow the aggressive hikes in the future. Remember, the market typically prices-in future news six months in advance so we may be starting to see the positive move we want six months before the Fed stops raising rates. HOWEVER, I will not base that assumption on one day of strong moves with strong volume but everything starts somewhere and today is that kind of day.

The NASDAQ was up 3% on volume 35% larger than yesterday while the DOW was up 2% on volume 26% larger than yesterday (the first major accumulation day in weeks, if not months). We never undercut the previous low set before the attempted rally so technically this can be a follow-through even though I marked it dead on Wednesday. I will now look for an additional follow-up move to confirm this move but the stop sign has been lifted for buying stocks. If you decide to start placing positions, please continue to use caution and strict selling rules so you don’t get whipsawed and lose a large amount of money in a short period of time. Use the proper position sizing techniques based on the size of your portfolios. Today was the largest daily gain for the DOW since April 2005, the largest for the NASDAQ since March 2004 and the largest for the S&P 500 since October 2003.

Another solid sign was the NH-NL ratio which recorded its first positive ratio (186-126) in 19 trading days (31 of the past 33 days have been negative).

So, how do we know if this is a true rally? The next step is to watch the leading stocks and start to place some test buys (about 1/3rd your typical position size) and see what happens. If you make money, the rally is telling you something, if your positions turn against you, it may be another bluff. I don’t know the answer but I will soon enough as I will be placing a few test buys. Depending on the action in the market tomorrow, I could be writing a great weekly analysis and updated MSW Index. Days like today are fun and I have been waiting for something like this to happen for a long time. I go on vacation Saturday but I am definitely bringing my laptop so I am able to watch the market and make moves next week.

As the Stock Trader’s Almanac states: the NASDAQ’s mid-year rally from the end of June through mid-July is strongest. The NASDAQ has been averaging a 3% gain since 1987 from the end of June to the second week of July versus 0.1% for the entire month of July. History also states that the gains over the next four months will be solid if July provides us with huge gains. In any event, continue to follow the price and volume of the indexes, the NH-NL ratio and individual market leaders.

Piranha

I dedicated a portion of this past Saturday’s weekly analysis to the NH-NL ratio; so I wanted to highlight the added chart that tracks the NASDAQ new highs and new lows at stockcharts.com. My weekly NH-NL ratio is compiled from IBD and stretched further than just the NASDAQ.

Prior to Today (Monday, June 26, 2006), the NH-NL ratio has closed in negative territory for 28 of the past 30 days, the longest streak over the past several years (since the bear market). The previous long streak from 2005 lasted 13 days during the month of October when we had three consecutive negative weeks. We have now had 15 consecutive negative days ending this past Friday, the weakest in years. Five of the past six weeks have been negative for the longest stretch of weakness since MSW has been publishing screens in early 2004. This is the longest negative NH-NL ratio streak since late 2001 and early 2002. With all of this weakness, I am amazed at how well the markets have held up compared to the bubble burst of 2000 and the strong bear market that lasted for a couple years from 2000-2002. This can only mean two things: the market still has more downside or the market has strength that will eventually show up with the DOW possibly making a new all-time high and the NASDAQ moving to new 52-week highs. Wow, I guess anyone can predict that (I took both sides of the coin).

Whatever is in store for us, we must follow the rules and wait patiently until the NH-NL ratio returns to positive territory, the market highlights new individual leaders and the major indexes recover their long term moving averages. Until all of this happens, I will remain in cash with a few long-term option positions. Even though I added several new names to the MSW Index, it remains strictly a watch list at this time.

Below is an updated look at the weekly averages for the NH-NL Ratio:
Saturday, January 14, 2006: 500-32
Saturday, January 21, 2006: 348-46
Saturday, January 28, 2006: 516-46
Saturday, February 4, 2006: 449-44
Saturday, February 11, 2006: 229-57
Saturday, February 18, 2006: 306-42
Saturday, February 25, 2006: 420-36
Saturday, March 04, 2006: 399-49
Saturday, March 11, 2006: 162-84
Saturday, March 18, 2006: 459-53
Saturday, March 25, 2006: 312-52
Saturday, April 01, 2006: 441-39
Saturday, April 08, 2006: 481-58
Saturday, April 15, 2006: 150-103
Saturday, April 22, 2006: 540-75
Saturday, April 29, 2006: 353-76
Saturday, May 6, 2006: 503-74
Saturday, May 13, 2006: 384-116
Saturday, May 20, 2006: 64-211
Saturday, May 27, 2006: 57-182
Saturday, June 3, 2006: 119-93
Saturday, June 10, 2006: 72-204
Saturday, June 17, 2006: 41-310
Saturday, June 24, 2006: 56-238 – This Past Week

As for new highs vs. new lows – here are the facts from last Week:
Monday showed a ratio of 59-240
Tuesday showed a ratio of 43-278
Wednesday showed a ratio of 64-192
Thursday showed a ratio of 59-227
Friday showed a ratio of 53-253

Another thing that I noticed on a combo chart (I first noticed this by Matthew Frailey) was the possible switch of favor from small caps to large caps in recent weeks. As you can see from the second chart (which tracks large caps versus small caps), large caps are starting to gain some strength by violating the trend line that dates back several years to the bubble burst. This is a secondary indicator that can be helpful but never use it alone or as a decision maker without first reviewing the price and volume of the market and the NH-NL ratio.

Piranha

I have been taping the 2005 US Poker Championships on ESPN with my DVR because I love to watch Texas hold ‘em. Most of you know by now that I love to play the game too. As the episode ended last night, they put up a stat that caught my attention even though I was starting to doze off. I paused the show, wrote down the statistics and thought to myself that it would serve as an excellent example on expectancy.

As you already know, a positive or negative expectancy can be achieved in multiple ways and the number of losers versus the number of winners does not matter so much when considering them individually. The power of expectancy takes place when you combine the percentage of winners and the size of the winner versus the percentage of losers and the size of the losers.

For more on expectancy please visit this post.
Also check out my expectancy calculator.

Poker expectancy example (this relates directly to trading):

Nine players at the table:
34 total hands were played in this round
Player A saw the flop 28 of 34 hands or 82% of the time
Player A won hands 16 out of 28 tries for a 57% winning percentage

Player B saw the flop 11 of 34 hands or 32% of the time
Player B won hands 4 out of 11 tries for a 36% winning percentage

Looking at these numbers and assuming that both players had equal chips (they were close), who do you think made more money during the round?

Most people would guess Player A due to the 57% winning percentage on 16 hands. Player B fails in comparison with only 4 wins, a quarter of the wins of Player A.

Well, Player A actually had a net loss of 5,500 chips
While Player B actually had a net gain of 10,000 chips.

So what is my point?

The point is that being more active or less active is not a way to guarantee success. You must formulate a positive expectancy system that balances the opportunities with minimal risk and maximum gain. Player B took on less opportunity but made the most of it when the opportunity arrived.

Player A was erratic and played several hands that gave him poor odds and this is what I see so many traders do when the market is weak such as now. They trade for the sake of trading and they lose. I told you yesterday that I haven’t made a trade in five weeks and I will not make one until I feel the right opportunities arrive. Until then, I battle my patience and stick to my rules so I don’t trade erratically and play the game for the sake of playing.

Now, to tie this into the current market, I want you all to look at the chart I posted on a couple forums yesterday and the daily screen last night. Several people jumped back into the market on the long side based on a “possible follow-through day” but I don’t see it and I will sit this hand out until I see the downtrend broken and the NH-NL ratio strengthened.

As many of you know, I have had a lot of time on my hands as the market has been trading in volatile patterns with a downward bias. The majority of my money has been parked on the sideline since mid-May with the exception of a few open option contracts (longer term plays). I have not made a trade in five weeks since the start of my vacation in late May and I have become very bored. It’s been tough writing nightly market analysis but I am doing my best to locate possible short setups, consistently monitor the mechanical screen and follow the few market leaders (I prefer to call them stocks with the best RS ratings and charts as no true leaders exist right now).

Using this free time, I have been comparing certain market indexes with other benchmarks that I have been following over the past 6-12 months. Two of these include the NASDAQ and crude oil (light contracts). Two charts are loaded to this blog post:

• The first chart is a combination index that I created myself using Stockcharts.com advanced tools. It combines the average close of both the NASDAQ and crude oil contracts over the past 10 years with a 200-d moving average. As you can see, the progression of this chart has called every major up-trend and downtrend before it was about to happen. The gray line on the chart represents the actual close of the NASDAQ index over the past 10 years (this line varies from the combo index). The only major divergence between the combo index I created and the actual price of the NASDAQ is during the past 18 months (since crude has gone wild). The combo index continues to trade downward as the NASDAQ trades sideways to slightly upward.

• The second chart compares the action among the NASDAQ and crude oil over the past 10 years without any special combination effect. As you can see here, both entities have been trending higher over the past 18 months. This is very different from the combo index in the first chart.

So how would I use this combo index?

It is a long term outlook index that seems qualified and prepared to call the next major up-trend for the NASDAQ. To do this, the combo line must cross back above the 200-d moving average with strength and consistency. It has not stayed above the 200-d m.a. for long periods of time since 2003, the most recent “up-trending bullish market”. Prior to 2003, we have not seen a true bull market up-trend with this combo index above the 200-d m.a. since 1997-1999. From mid 2000 on, the combo index has spent much of its time below the 200-d m.a. and we all know how the market has behaved since March 2000.

So, to answer a question I received about a recent comment on a blog post: yes, I do believe that crude oil must cool off before we can sustain a major bull rally and this combo index may prove my theory correct if it continues to trade accordingly. But then again, it is only a theory and I am not into predictions.

Enjoy the combo index.

The DOW was back above 11,000 with a 1.8% gain on volume that was close to yesterday’s average while the NASDAQ was up 2.8% on volume 6% larger than yesterday. Advancers led decliners by a 4-to-1 ratio on the NASDAQ as many familiar stocks joined the party.

This was the best gain for the NASDAQ since March 25, 2004, well before the official start of MSW, although I was running these screens on several internet forums. It was also the first back-to-back triple digit gain for the DOW in 18 months as all 30 DOW stocks ended higher (not that we follow these blue chips).

The S&P 500 gained 26.12 points for its best one day gain since Mach 17, 2003 when it gained just under 30 points. The gains were solid but the volume was lacking for an all-out accumulation day as the NH-NL ratio finally subsided a bit with a final tally of 57-124 (still negative but looks much better than the past week).

If you are wondering about a rally, today was the second day of a newly attempted rally with a follow-through targeted for Monday thru Friday of next week. The rally count reset after we hit a new low, lower than the previous rally attempt. I told you that July was the only bullish month of the summer so I wouldn’t be surprised to see a move heading into next month. Don’t jump in early but start to review the stocks on the daily screens and look for candidates that consistently show up every night. I am doing the same and looking to start with a fresh batch of stocks for the MSW Index.

This next chart is one that is used by Trader Mike, a trader I have spoken about in the past, who I respect. It is the % of stocks above their 50-day moving average (it gauges the strength among the individual stocks on the index). I have never used this indicator but it seems very interesting so I will post it here for the first time. From what I understand, 20 and 80 are the extreme levels that can and sometimes do give buy and sell signals. For now, I will start to view it as a secondary indicator with relation to the NH-NL ratio I use. I would like to observe it for myself for a period of time before influencing decisions based on the action of the chart.

Finally, crude oil is still above the support area of $70 and until this breaks, I don’t see any major bull markets in the near future. Just an opinion of mine (I do understand that opinions are worthless in the market)!

Piranha